Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mention the panic function in CheckAlignment #113078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2023

Conversation

saethlin
Copy link
Member

@saethlin saethlin commented Jun 27, 2023

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 27, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 27, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 27, 2023

📌 Commit cdaac87 has been approved by RalfJung

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 27, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 27, 2023

⌛ Testing commit cdaac87 with merge f42f19b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 27, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: RalfJung
Pushing f42f19b to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 27, 2023
@bors bors merged commit f42f19b into rust-lang:master Jun 27, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 27, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f42f19b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.9% [0.9%, 0.9%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.1% [2.1%, 2.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 662.354s -> 661.852s (-0.08%)

@saethlin saethlin deleted the mention-the-function branch July 10, 2023 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants